Details
-
Epic
-
Status: In Progress
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
-
None
-
Runtime convergence: tDataprepRun to reuse tck processor
-
To Do
-
2
-
13
-
12
-
Strategic roadmap
Description
In the goal to avoid customer data to transit in Talend Cloud, the tDataprepRun from DI job (does not concern TBD here), must:
- call Dataprep to retrieve the list of recipe of transformation (uppercase, phone number formatting, etc.)
- not sent data to be transformed to Dataprep but instead transform them locally through tck processor that will be developed by Data-streams team and available in connectors-ee.
- support migration from legacy tDataprepRun/DI
Acceptance Criteria
- No more data is sent to talend cloud
- All dataprep functions are usable
- Preparation Id and version can be defined with context value
- An existing studio job with legacy tDataprepRun will be executable as is after new tck/dataprep replacement
- Download dictionnary only if needed even if dictionary access is configured
New: Must still work like before for Dataprep on-prem
DoR
Topic | Description | DoR |
Description | Is the functional requirement clearly stated? Is the user-story properly defined? (As a user XXX, I want to YYY in order to ZZZ & functional description) |
![]() |
Jira information | Is the Jira information correct? (fix version, labels, security level, Component, sprint, estimation) | ![]() |
Environment | Environment ready Support SSL Reachable for QA/Doc/automation(TTP, Junit)/beta testers… |
![]() |
Target | fixVersion/Application | ![]() |
License | Is license EE or SE clearly identified ? | ![]() |
Technical Analysis | Does the developer understand how it will be implemented? Do we have a solution? No current solution for Guess schema. lookup connectors dependencies still in discussion. Approved/discussed with architecture (in-team, global or security, depending on the scope)? |
![]() |
Dependencies | Are all dependencies linked to JIRA (link "depends on")? Are they done? Including SRE/Devops/IT |
![]() |
Migrations | Is migration needed? Maybe there will be some migration. | ![]() |
Doc | Is DOCT created and linked under the epic? | ![]() |
Communication channel | Is slack feat- created?With all the correct owner involved? (QA/Doc/PO/SM) | ![]() |
UX | Are there changes in the UI? Does it contain a mockup? Was it approved by UX? Not yet approved, should be the same as tadatapreprun. |
![]() |